[Equest-users] OA-CFM/PER?
Fleming, Joe
joe.fleming at tlc-eng.com
Tue Oct 5 06:42:27 PDT 2010
We had just noticed that typo over here this week as well. It is FLOW/PER in the .inp file.
Another question on that topic.
If you input outside air as "OUTSIDE-AIR-FLOW" for each zone, does this override DCV's ability to ratchet down the outside air rate based on occupancy schedule?
Should OA be input as people and "OA-FLOW/PER", when trying to accurately model DCV?
Sometimes when using DCV we don't see near the savings that we would expect for a South Florida climate. And we have yet to pinpoint the outside air loads on the systems in the detailed simulation output reports.
Joe Fleming
E.I., LEED AP BD+C, BEMP
Mechanical Engineer I
TLC Engineering for Architecture
Your 2030 Challenge Partner
800 Fairway Drive, Suite 250
Deerfield Beach, FL 33441-1816
phone:
954-418-9096
fax:
954-418-9296
direct:
954-418-4591
website:
www.tlc-engineers.com<http://www.tlc-engineers.com>
[cid:image001.gif at 01CB6470.6E151020]<http://www.tlc-engineers.com/>
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of STEVE SAMENSKI
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 7:55 PM
To: equest-users
Subject: [Equest-users] OA-CFM/PER?
Here's a question about Demand Controlled Ventilation in eQuest. I'm trying to justify a model I built that uses critical zone DCV. In the past I've simply trusted that eQuest calculates this properly but now I find myself having to provide backup rationale to the USGBC.
In Volume 6 of the documentation it states: "Each zone OA requirement is calculated based upon the hourly maximum of either OA-CFM/PER (times the NUMBER-OF-PEOPLE adjusted by the hourly PEOPLE-SCHEDULE) or a minimum OA ventilation rate." However, "OA-CFM/PER" is never defined in any other dictionary, at least not in any manner that would tell you how to change or input this variable (it is referenced elsewhere). I think this is a typo. I think the sentence should refer to "OA-FLOW/PER", which is a perfectly transparent and well-behaved user input (so far as I know).
Anyone run across this before? Can anyone confirm that Volume 6 has a typo?
Steve Samenski, PE, LEED AP, BEMP
Vice President - Sustainable Technologies
The Spinnaker Group, Inc.
http://equest-diary.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101005/aa74ed24/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 5272 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101005/aa74ed24/attachment.gif>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list