<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>As a side note, Dru was probably quoting George Box:</p>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_models_are_wrong">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_models_are_wrong</a></p>
    <p>Jason<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/14/2023 2:12 PM, Jim Dirkes via
      Bldg-sim wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:E-XNMoS0jj8ky02e4JeYkLrVPKmnWHsE4XsP6_lgleYRRnAK3RjlSdxHlURK9zixfHhc8WPrwODDQ_9JfCHSkeXBZnCWjXt2vgqh90MbHkY=@protonmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">I
        think Dru Crawley coined the phrase, "All models are wrong. Some
        are useful."</div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Chris,
        you highlighted an assortment of variables which are
        omnipresent, inconsistent and uncontrollable - so what, exactly,
        does your client expect? Is it a realistic expectation? For
        example, are they going to nail you to the wall when,
        inevitably, you are "wrong" next year?</div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">I
        have not calibrated many models, but have been made more
        appreciative of all the uncontrollables by the ones I calibrated
        :(. All the statisticians know that there is always more than
        one solution which will result in a high R2 value or low CVRSME,
        so which is correct?</div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Rather
        than a calibrated model, lately I've been encouraging clients to
        consider one of the FDD platforms on top of their Building
        Automation System. Spending time and money to evaluate whether
        things are working properly makes more sense to me - it's "real
        life" vs a prediction. (Can't forget to mention thoughtful and
        thorough commissioning here; that's essential.)</div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">ps,
        I love your thoughtful approach. You're setting a great example!
        One aspect of that is to reach out to the wider modeling
        community to gather input and feedback.</div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="protonmail_signature_block" style="font-family: Arial,
        sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
        <div class="protonmail_signature_block-user">
          <p style="margin-bottom:6pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"
              class="highlight"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);"
                class="colour"><span style="font-family:Arial,
                  Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="font">Jim Dirkes  1631
                  Acacia Drive NW Grand Rapids, MI 49504 -  616 450 8653</span></span></span><br>
          </p>
          <div><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"
              class="highlight"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);"
                class="colour"><span style="font-family:Arial,
                  Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="font"><b>Coffee
                    Conversation:</b></span></span></span></div>
          <div><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"
              class="highlight"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);"
                class="colour"><span style="font-family:Arial,
                  Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="font"><b><span
                      style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,
sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px;font-weight:400;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);display:inline;">The "individual"
                      is an impossible concept, conceived by the
                      Enlightenment philosophers. It makes no sense to
                      the Christian. In marriages, and families, in
                      associations and friendships and religious orders,
                      we are not individuals, but a communion of
                      persons.</span><br>
                  </b></span></span></span></div>
        </div>
        <div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton
          protonmail_signature_block-empty"> </div>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="protonmail_quote"> ------- Original Message -------<br>
        On Tuesday, March 14th, 2023 at 2:10 PM,
        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com">chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com</a>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com"><chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
        <br>
        <blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I think I need to
                qualify this: informed by G14, but definitely not
                compliant with it! There is some allowance for repairing
                or “healing” data, but when the data has a lot of holes
                or modes/ category variables then forget it. This is my
                case, but the client still wants some kind of
                representative simulation.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Monthly models can be
                garbage. School holidays cut across months at different
                times, combined heat and power is popular which
                complicates gas usage especially when metering is
                limited… did the heat by-product of electricity
                generation go to the building, or was it rejected? They
                can work for heating in our temperate climate, but not
                for cooling.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Nevertheless, we need
                some kind of representative simulation model. We can’t
                make any ECM qualifying claims but we can do something
                useful. This is where these methods can give you a lot
                of insight before you start modelling.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I hadn’t tried the
                IMT previously. We tend to have limited our regression
                analysis to monthly “degree day” methods (your 2p model,
                I think). I plugged some project specific daily
                electricity data into the MVR example (multi variate
                regression) and it seemed to give decent CVRMSE (~2-3%)
                but low R2 (~0.7). However, it appeared to provide some
                insight on cooling usage (monthly 2p models are
                meaningless for this in the UK’s temperate climate).</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I also made some 2p
                monthly models of gas. I thought these were good until I
                compared successive years. <b>I guess this is were
                  understanding a range of statistical indices is
                  helpful.</b></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Here’s the final rub,
                because the underlying data has so many inconsistencies
                that can only be made sense of with some regression
                models, it’s easier to “calibrate” the simulation model
                to the regression models than the original data. But I
                may use 2p monthly for gas, daily MVR for electric…</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">So I need to ask if I
                have wondered completely off-piste with this!</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Chris</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span></p>
            <div>
              <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
                1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
                    lang="EN-US"> David Eldridge
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dancingdavide@hotmail.com"><dancingdavide@hotmail.com></a> <br>
                    <b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 14, 2023 12:53 PM<br>
                    <b>To:</b> Jim Dirkes
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jvdirkes2@protonmail.com"><jvdirkes2@protonmail.com></a><br>
                    <b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com">chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com</a>;
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bldg-sim@onebuilding.org">bldg-sim@onebuilding.org</a><br>
                    <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bldg-sim] Lies, darn lies, and
                    statistics</span></p>
              </div>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Indirectly there probably isn’t a daily
              set of metrics in the Guideline since the simulation
              programs aren’t usually outputting daily results, but
              there’s no reason there couldn’t be one statistically.  </p>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">You could make one if you had only
                daily utility data and had to aggregate the simulation
                results to daily totals, there isn’t a published target
                metric but you could still show that you calculated one
                and why you think it was a good or bad result.</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">DSE Mobile</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                  <br>
                </p>
                <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                  <p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt" class="MsoNormal">On
                    Mar 14, 2023, at 6:10 AM, Jim Dirkes via Bldg-sim
                    <<a href="mailto:bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org"
                      rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org</a>>
                    wrote:</p>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Dear
                        Chris,</span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Kudos
                        for appreciating a gap in your understanding.
                        (I'm in your camp)</span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">On
                        the other hand, there are SO many variables in
                        building operation that, short of a highly
                        instrumented (and carefully calibrated) building
                        for everything from lights to people to plug
                        loads to HVAC - calibration is a fiction (and
                        I'm confident that no such building exists).
                        Daily calibration is a complete fiction, perhaps
                        even a deception. On top of that, a "calibrated"
                        model is just a moment in time; everything going
                        forward is guaranteed to be different than
                        during the calibration time period.</span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">I
                        think of "calibration" as more like a
                        sensitivity analysis - determine which variables
                        matter more and which matter less. GenOpt works
                        nicely for that purpose <a target="_blank"
href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flbl-srg%2FGenOpt&data=05%7C01%7C%7C0d63c1ff284443bc766608db247cc033%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638143890442545264%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hMX7ISkjm6aByq3ZaUXf5p2QKTf3nlOBYbgP7ALodWQ%3D&reserved=0"
                          rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener"
                          moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/lbl-srg/GenOpt</a></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p
                        style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"
                        class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white">Jim
                            Dirkes  1631 Acacia Drive NW Grand Rapids,
                            MI 49504 -  616 450 8653</span></span><span
style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><b><span
style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white">Coffee
                                Conversation:</span></b></span><span
                            style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"></span></p>
                      </div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span
                              style="color:black;background:white">The "individual"
                              is an impossible concept, conceived by the
                              Enlightenment philosophers. It makes no
                              sense to the Christian. In marriages, and
                              families, in associations and friendships
                              and religious orders, we are not
                              individuals, but a communion of persons.</span></span><span
style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"></span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal">------- Original Message
                      -------<br>
                      On Tuesday, March 14th, 2023 at 6:52 AM, Chris
                      Yates via Bldg-sim <<a
                        href="mailto:bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org"
                        rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                    </p>
                    <blockquote
                      style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                      <div>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">Hi All</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">I do find ASHRAE Guideline
                          14 a little too hardcore for my basic
                          understanding of statistics. I can plug any of
                          the equations into Excel, but I’ve realised my
                          statistics understanding is very limited! (I’m
                          outed!)</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">We don’t actually have to
                          work to G14 in the UK (probably good because
                          my copy is a bit old). I finally realised I
                          didn’t know enough after I’d been (lazily)
                          using R2 in Excel on some monthly data. I
                          thought that R2 > 0.9 was generally ok…
                          yeah, it wasn’t.</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">So, are there any easy to
                          understand resources available?</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">I’ve been messing around
                          with the IMT as well. It’s been fun going back
                          to DOS <span style="font-family:"Segoe
                            UI Emoji",sans-serif">😊</span>. This
                          got me into daily methods, which leads to my
                          next question. Is there any reason why there
                          isn’t a daily calibration option specified in
                          G14?</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">Many thanks!</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal">Chris Yates</p>
                        <p
                          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"
                          class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
                    Bldg-sim mailing list<br>
                    <a
href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org"
                      rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a><br>
                    To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank
                    message to <a
                      href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG"
                      rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a></p>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="60">-- 
Jason Glazer, P.E., BEMP, GARD Analytics, 90.1 ECB chair
Admin for onebuilding.org building performance mailing lists
</pre>
  </body>
</html>