<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Droid Serif";}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Droid Serif";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Has the USGBC allowed lighting power density savings for multi-family projects in the dwelling units?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">The CaGBC has allowed credit to be taken in dwelling units for LEED 2009 and I am how it will be handled with LEED v4?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Christopher Jones, P. Eng.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><br>
<i>Consulting Engineers & Scientists</i><br>
901 King Street West, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3H5<br>
<b>T:</b> (519) 823-1311 ext 2052 <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">M:</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> (416) 697-0056
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>via Bldg-sim<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 16, 2016 12:40 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Bldg-sim] 90.1 - Minimum LPD for dwelling units<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">Hello,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">I’m a little confuse since I have read that article about 90.1 2013 addendum. (<a href="http://www.buildings.com/news/industry-news/articleid/20142/title/multifamily-may-be-responsible-for-tenant-lighting-.aspx">http://www.buildings.com/news/industry-news/articleid/20142/title/multifamily-may-be-responsible-for-tenant-lighting-.aspx</a>).
It says:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#605F59;background:white">More importantly, the standard would compel owners to address lighting within dwelling units, which have historically fallen
outside of 90.1’s scope.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#605F59;background:white"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">Three questions about this statement :
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">1)</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">For a compliance path (like comCheck), which article from part 9 of the 90.1 standard (2010 or 2013) specifically exclude dwelling unit to have minimum LPD?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">2)</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">Since Table 9.5.1 have a minimum LPD requirement for “multifamily” (that obviously include dwelling units), why Table 9.6.1 have no building type specific space type named “dwelling” or a common space
type for “bedroom” (for those who want to split the dwelling in different rooms)?
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">3)</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">In a LEED project (annex G) it’s common to combined dwelling units with the same orientation in a single thermal block, which LPD value do you enter in your model for these thermal block ? (I assume
LPD are same for your proposed and your baseline simulation)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif"">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif";color:#1F497D">____________________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">Julien Dutel,</span></b><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">
ing., </span><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">CEM, CMVP<b>.</b></span><b><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:FR-CA"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#2E74B5;mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">Ministère des Ressources naturelles<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#2E74B5;mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">Téléphone : 418 627-6379, poste 8060<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#2E74B5;mso-fareast-language:FR-CA">mern.gouv.qc.ca<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="mso-fareast-language:FR-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="mso-fareast-language:FR-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Droid Serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-size:7pt;">
<hr>
RWDI - One of Canada's 50 Best Managed Companies - This communication is intended for the sole use of the party to whom it was addressed and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and delete the message without retaining any hard or electronic copies of same. Outgoing emails are scanned for viruses, but no warranty is made to their
absence in this email or attachments. If you require any information supplied by RWDI in a different format to facilitate accessibility, contact the sender of the email, email solutions@rwdi.com or call +1.519.823.1311.
<hr>
</div>
</body>
</html>