<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.hoenzb
{mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">FYI:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Many of the web-based, code compliant programs, such as IC3 (<a href="http://ic3.tamu.edu/">http://ic3.tamu.edu/</a>) are actually using parameters and/or an
include file to do their business. So, one might say that much of the work in this area continues, but under another umbrella. Feel free to login and check it out. Information about the development of IC3 can be found on our Lab’s web site (<a href="http://esl.tamu.edu/terp/reports">http://esl.tamu.edu/terp/reports</a>),
including a sample input file that delivers a code-compliant building.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Jeff<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:blue">8=! 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=( 8=) 8=() 8=) 8=| 8=) :=') 8=) 8=?<br>
Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D.,P.E.inactive,FASHRAE,FIBPSA,......<a href="mailto:........jhaberl@tamu.edu">jhaberl@tamu.edu</a><br>
Professor........................................................................Office Ph: 979-845-6507<br>
Department of Architecture............................................Lab Ph:979-845-6065<br>
Energy Systems Laboratory...........................................FAX: 979-862-2457<br>
Texas A&M University...................................................77843-3581<br>
College Station, Texas, USA, 77843..............................URL:www.esl.tamu.edu<br>
8=/ 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=() 8=) :=) 8=) 8=! 8=) 8=? 8=) 8=0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Joe Huang<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 11, 2015 3:05 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bldg-sim] 100 simulations<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Parametric study of building variations is perhaps where computer simulations are at their best in playing the what-if game!<br>
<br>
It's troubling and unfortunate that there was more such studies back 20-30 years ago than now, where the focus has been on developing ever more complicated building models and ever more detailed algorithms, with the apparent goal of creating pristine one-time-use
building models.<br>
<br>
I remember when I was first introduced to building energy simulations at UC Berkeley in 1980, one of my class assignments was to use Murray Milne's SOLAR-5 program to study the change in loads for different building orientations. When I first went to LBNL
(LBL in those days :-)), I created a residential building energy data base for which I created 5 prototypical residential building models full of macros, which allowed me to do a hundred parametric for each building model in 45 locations, stepping through
common variations of ceiling and wall insulation, window area/orientation/panes of glass, infiltration rates, etc., or around 10,000-20,000 runs in all. These were then reduced to nonlinear equations that drove simplified programs such as PEAR (Program for
Energy Analysis of Residences, LBNL 1987) or ARES (Automated Residential Energy Standard, PNNL 1989).
<br>
<br>
In 1990, I worked briefly for a East Coast consultant company that did a lot of utility-supported DSM projects. For those, we would typically build a base building model, and then ran it through a dozen or more EEMs requested by the A/E Team.
<br>
<br>
In 2004, I had a project to calculate U/SHGC trade-off equations for DOE's EnergyStar Windows, for which I wrote a batch process for iterative DOE-2 simulations varying the U-factor until the building energy use was within 0.02MBTU of the EnergyStar Window.
The same procedure could also be used to search for the minimum building energy cost, or automated optimization.<br>
<br>
What I'm trying to say is that parametric analysis has always been around, and not particularly difficult to do as long as we move away from using GUI interfaces to writing building input files with macros, and then add scripts to the batch file to set the
macros in the run stream. <br>
<br>
Joe <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Joe Huang<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>White Box Technologies, Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Moraga CA 94556<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com">yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com">http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com</a> for simulation-ready weather data<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>(o) (925)388-0265<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>(c) (510)928-2683<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>"building energy simulations at your fingertips"<o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 9/11/2015 7:17 AM, R B wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dan, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">You are right that most of the 'optimization' happens once all the massing/shape/room locations/configurations are finalized. Even now, I dread when I am asked to help with energy analysis during the early design phase since I have this
at the back of the mind that the architect might come back with several totally new designs (shape/floors etc.) and I will have to redo the whole process. This has never happened in my case, and most decisions are WWR, insulation, glass types, shading and
major system types.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">To get back to your question, for the type of analysis that you have outlined, you might want to look at the expert system based research in architecture departments where they work on automatic design generation. Carnegie Mellon comes
to mind since I was involved in this type of work ages back (that was in the 90's.). Microstation/Autocad might have these kind of tools inbuilt by now (I havn't really kept up with this topic), and since they also have energy tools connection - what you are
suggesting seems doable.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Rohini<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Dan Johnson <<a href="mailto:dan@designandenergy.com" target="_blank">dan@designandenergy.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Aaron and Jason, I like this thread. I noticed that the curve Aaron presented for WWR vs. Source Energy shows only a 4% difference in Source Energy over a range of 0-50% WWR---I would say a negligible difference from optimizing this component
alone. An architect would shrug this off, despite the thought and computing power that went into it. This got me to thinking that, as an architect, the aspect my colleagues most have trouble with is the arrangement of building elements, rather than the optimization
of each one. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jason's questions related to arrangement---how many floors? what shape building?---would be the most useful for conceptual design, in my opinion. I would leave alone insulation levels and even WWR at the programming/conceptual stage, and
instead run hundreds of simulations with different *arrangements* of zones. I would further clarify this point by adding to Jason's questions list:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Does the conference room go on the east or west (re: sun exposure)? Under the roof, or in the basement?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. How deep can floor plates be, and still achieve adequate daylighting?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. What aspect ratio of the atrium vs. the floor plates gives us adequate natural ventilation?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">4. If I put the fume hoods in the classroom, I have to ventilate the whole classroom, but if I put them only in prep rooms, that is a much smaller air volume...what difference does this make?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">5. If I cluster all my public circulation to one side, and naturally ventilate this, how much energy do I save vs. distributed circulation that is conditioned with fans?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">6. Add a giant, beautiful glass staircase---do I save enough elevator energy to offset the conditioning of the staircase?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In typical optimization modeling, the geometry is fixed and we vary the component parameters. I'd like to see the opposite.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If the auto-generating algorithm could produce a 3D mass diagram of color-coded zone blobs, perhaps as a Sketchup object, that would communicate well.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Again, architects tend to have trouble with the spatial arrangement of zones as something driven by performance. Perhaps the most useful thing at the programming/concept design stage is help with arrangement. Thank you, Dan J<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dan Johnson | Design and Energy | <a href="tel:510.325.5672" target="_blank">
510.325.5672</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Assoc. AIA, ASHRAE, LEED AP, CEPE, CPHC | 907 Ramona Ave. Albany California 94706<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Aaron Powers <<a href="mailto:caaronpowers@gmail.com" target="_blank">caaronpowers@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: Jason Glazer <<a href="mailto:jglazer@gard.com" target="_blank">jglazer@gard.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:bldg-sim@onebuilding.org" target="_blank">bldg-sim@onebuilding.org</a><br>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:46:16 -0500<br>
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] 100 simulations<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Jason,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">This is something I'm interested in as well. I think all the preliminary design factors that you mentioned are great things to look at. On the later parts of the design process, control parameters are also
good things to look at (CHW plant control optimization, air-side control optimization, etc.).<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">One way to convey the information is through simple 2D plots. Below is an example of 200 DOE2 simulations while varying the window to wall ratio and another plot of 81 simulations varying the window shading
coefficient.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><img border="0" width="525" height="375" id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image002.jpg@01D0ECA3.E9E7C790" alt="Inline image 1"><img border="0" width="525" height="375" id="_x0000_i1026" src="cid:image004.jpg@01D0ECA3.E9E7C790" alt="Inline
image 2"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Unfortunately, this does not convey the interactive nature of optimization over multiple variables. Using multidimensional optimization algorithms can be another useful tool, but they can be tricky. As an
example, below is a case of looking for the optimal minimum condenser water flow in a variable flow condenser system. From looking at the first plot, the function seems relatively smooth and it's obvious that there's an optimal in the neighborhood of 0.6.
However, if you zoom in (second plot), you can see that the data is not very smooth, and there are all kinds of jagged local minima/maxima. These will tend to throw off most optimization algorithms, which is why I think it's helpful to consider looking at
automated mass simulations before taking on the problem of optimization.<br>
<br>
<img border="0" width="525" height="380" id="_x0000_i1027" src="cid:image006.jpg@01D0ECA3.E9E7C790" alt="Inline image 5"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img border="0" width="525" height="377" id="_x0000_i1028" src="cid:image008.jpg@01D0ECA3.E9E7C790" alt="Inline image 4"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Aaron<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Jason Glazer <<a href="mailto:jglazer@gard.com">jglazer@gard.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">I am just finishing up a project that performed about 60 automated simulations (using Python with EnergyPlus and Eppy) for a series of buildings in a bunch of cities. The power of automating simulations to understand the energy savings
of different measures is very impressive no matter what tools are being used. It has made me wonder about when does automation make the most sense during the design process and what information can be provided to an architect or entire building design team
to encourage low energy building design. I am thinking one of the most influential times might be during the architectural programming and early conceptual design steps. At this point the number of separate pieces of information is probably low enough that
it could be filled out on a web form:<br>
<br>
- number of occupants<br>
<br>
- amount of area needed for different types of spaces<br>
<br>
- location of the lot lines<br>
<br>
- building location<br>
<br>
Conceivably, with that information, all sorts of various building configurations could be created automatically by a clever script then simulated and the resulting answers summarized.<br>
<br>
- How many floor building uses the least energy?<br>
<br>
- What shape building uses the least energy?<br>
<br>
- What is the impact of more roof insulation?<br>
<br>
- What is the impact of more or less fenestration on loads and daylighting?<br>
<br>
I would not expect the design team to use any of the automatically created building models directly but it might influence the design process in a good way if it was easy to get and easy to understand. I understand people have been researching the optimization
of these kinds of factors but I am not sure that is necessary. Maybe just several different series of simulations illustrating various building options and their impact onenergy might be enough to get the discussion going.<br>
<br>
- So what questions do you think could be answered by such an automated system during early conceptual design?<br>
<br>
- How would you best convey that information to the building design team?<br>
<br>
- Are there other times that a suite of automated simulations would make sense?<br>
<br>
A lot of useful information could be generated with a hundred automated simulations!<br>
<br>
Jason<br>
<br>
<span class="hoenzb">-- </span><br>
<span class="hoenzb">Jason Glazer, P.E., GARD Analytics, 90.1 ECB chair</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb">Admin for <a href="http://onebuilding.org" target="_blank">onebuilding.org</a> building performance mailing lists</span><br>
<br>
<span class="hoenzb">_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb">Bldg-sim mailing list</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb"><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a></span><br>
<span class="hoenzb">To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
<a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<span class="hoenzb">-- </span><span class="hoenzb"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my DynaTAC 8000x<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<span class="hoenzb">_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb">Bldg-sim mailing list</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb"><a href="mailto:Bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org" target="_blank">Bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org</a></span><br>
<span class="hoenzb"><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bldg-sim mailing list<br>
<a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Bldg-sim mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>