<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rtc="http://microsoft.com/officenet/conferencing" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:Repl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/" xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ppda="http://www.passport.com/NameSpace.xsd" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">It’s like herding cats.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Our practice is heavily involved with Government projects, all of which need to comply with the various laws (EPACT and EISA) and Executive Orders that drive
building energy savings performance in addition to project specific performance within the LEED rating system.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">It is an interesting analysis process, as we have to evaluate energy (kBtu) vs. cost (utility) vs. fossil fuel use (FFU) (including utility grid impacts) savings,
all with the goal of meeting minimum performance goals of 30% for EPACT (a 90.1-2004 baseline, which can be increased on an agency/department basis, as in one case has been raised to 50% energy savings compared to a 90.1-2007 baseline), minimum 10% (which
usually ends up 30% or higher) for LEED, and a minimum 55% FFU reduction for EISA (ratcheted up to 100% avoidance by 2030).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">With the singular exception of the EISA FFU requirement, all measures to achieve stated goals must be proven Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effective or compliance can
be waived. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">While a DOE proposed EISA ruling, if promulgated, pushes off the EISA FFU reduction requirement for at least one year, this one law (if unaltered, by law or
interpretive rule) is the heavy hitter as it requires either a substantial change in our utility grid system (to eliminate fossil fuels) or forces the project to be off the grid (or forces the Agency or Department head to officially ask for a waiver for non-compliance).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Why do I bring all of this up?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">If USGBC is pursuing the goal of seeking energy savings (kBtu) in addition to utility savings (and they can be at cross purposes, as with thermal storage),
then shouldn’t it also seek to reduce greenhouse gases, as in fossil fuel reduction? A balance could be sought, as an example consider that a tri-generation process can produce less greenhouse gases compared to an open-loop heat pump approach given the fossil
fuel type used by the electric utility provider.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Of course, to be technically correct, there are the greenhouse and environmental impacts to be considered with natural gas fracking (also with coal mining and
off-shore drilling). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’m sure there are plans for expansion of our nuclear power generation on the grid, with its own inherent concerns.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Deep geothermal, if available, does seem to offer the best promise for a 24 hour supply source. Solar, hydronic and PV just doesn’t seem to be LCC effective
except for the most expensive utility rate structures.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="638" style="width:6.65in;border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="155" style="width:116.6pt;border:none;border-right:solid #B1A698 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;text-autospace:ideograph-other">
<b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">David Ellis</span></b><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;text-autospace:ideograph-other">
<b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">PE</span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">
</span><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">(VA, MD, DC)</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;text-autospace:ideograph-other">
<b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">CEM, LEED AP</span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
</td>
<td width="483" style="width:362.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:ideograph-other"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">ENERGY DESIGN SOLUTIONS<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:ideograph-other"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">ENERGY SERVICES MANAGER
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="155" style="width:116.6pt;border:none;border-right:solid white 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;text-autospace:ideograph-other">
<b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
</td>
<td width="483" style="width:362.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:ideograph-other"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="155" style="width:116.6pt;border:none;border-right:solid #B1A698 1.0pt;padding:6.0pt 5.75pt 6.0pt 5.75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;text-autospace:ideograph-other">
<b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><a href="http://hdrarchitecture.com/"><span style="color:#595959">HDRArchitecture.com</span></a></span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
</td>
<td width="483" style="width:362.2pt;padding:6.0pt 5.75pt 6.0pt 5.75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:ideograph-other"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959">703.647.7735 | c+txt 703.343.6758<br>
HDR Architecture, Inc. | 1101 King Street, Suite 400 | Alexandria, VA 22314</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#595959"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Carol Gardner [mailto:cmg750@gmail.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 16, 2011 2:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Aleka Pappas<br>
<b>Cc:</b> bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bldg-sim] Energy Model Cost - best designdoesn'tequalmost LEED points<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">It's interesting that just as we are having this discussion, the budget for CBECS is going away:
<a href="http://blog.bepinfo.com/2011/05/death-knell-for-energy-star-building.html">
http://blog.bepinfo.com/2011/05/death-knell-for-energy-star-building.html</a>. So even one less source of EUI information for people to use. Ironic!<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Aleka Pappas <<a href="mailto:apappas@group14eng.com">apappas@group14eng.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I did some pre-RFP modeling for Denver Housing Authority to try to help them develop realistic</span> & useful energy metric design goals for a recent project.
We ended up setting a percent energy cost saving goal (ie LEED) along with a site
<i>lbs CO2 emissions/ SF</i> goal for the design. We started out with a kBtu/ SF metric, but weren't happy with the way this quantified environmental impact in Colorado. This is because most of our electricity comes from coal and it's CO2 intensive relative
to natural gas, but looks better than natural gas when looking at site kBtu/ SF. It's interesting how this will change design decisions compared to just looking at energy cost savings relative to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline; it's much easier to hit 50% savings
with an all electric building, but CO2 emissions go up.<br>
The metrics DHA ended up included in their RFP came out of modeling the actual building type in the actual location of the project, so we were comfortable with them being reasonable design goals for the 'as-designed' building. We also made sure that people
understood the difference between 'as-designed' modeling and 'operational' building energy use. It was great to work with a really progressive client who gets it and wanted to look at these details closely.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black">Aleka Pappas</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Building Energy Engineer<b><br>
<br>
GROUP</b></span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#00B0F0">14</span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">
<span style="color:black">ENGINEERING, INC. </span></span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><br>
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#00B0F0">Inspiring better buildings.</span>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">1325 E. 16th Ave, Denver, CO 80218</span>
<span style="color:black"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Direct:
<a href="tel:720.221.1082" target="_blank">720.221.1082</a>/ Main: <a href="tel:303.861.2070" target="_blank">
303.861.2070</a>/Fax: <a href="tel:303.830.2016" target="_blank">303.830.2016</a><br>
<a href="http://www.group14eng.com" target="_blank">www.group14eng.com</a><br>
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
<i>Group14 Engineering offers building energy optimization, LEED coordination, commissioning, energy audits, LEED EBOM, and greenhouse gas analysis.</i></span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
On 5/16/2011 10:51 AM, Goldwasser, David wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>One variation I was considering to EUI was to look at Kbtu per annual occupant hour vs. Kbtu per area. This came about when I wanted know how to evaluate some operational alternatives such as extending the hours of operation for a facility, or looking at an office running with a rotating staff all working 4x10 hour days a week vs. a smaller static staff in the same building working 5x8 hour days a week. Kbtu/sf2 alone didn't help here, but looking at Kbtu per annual occupant hour did.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Extending operational hours will clearly increase your Kbtu/ft2 (EUI) but the question I wanted to answer is if those extra occupant hours come at a lower energy impact per occupant hour than the baseline case. "Kbtu/ annual occupant hour" addressed this. Is there a similar metric that anyone else is using?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>David<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>--<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>David Goldwasser, LEED AP<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>National Renewable Energy Laboratory<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>From: <a href="mailto:bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org" target="_blank">bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org</a> [<a href="mailto:bldg-sim" target="_blank">mailto:bldg-sim</a>-<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:bounces@lists.onebuilding.org" target="_blank">bounces@lists.onebuilding.org</a>] On Behalf Of Marcus Sheffer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 10:16 AM<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To: 'Paul Riemer'; <a href="mailto:bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org" target="_blank">bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Energy Model Cost - best designdoesn'tequalmost LEED<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>points<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Paul,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>The next version of LEED will approach a more standardized metric (EUI Source<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Energy) but still include cost as a metric as well. For those who feel<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>strongly that only actual energy use should be used for green building<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>certification the LEED EBOM methodologies will be allowed into LEED BD+C<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>projects.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>USGBC is trying hard to lead us to that better way. If you know the better<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>way please share.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Marcus Sheffer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Energy Opportunities, Inc/a 7group Company<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>1200 E Camping Area Road, Wellsville, PA 17365<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="tel:717-292-2636" target="_blank">717-292-2636</a>, <a href="mailto:sheffer@sevengroup.com" target="_blank">sheffer@sevengroup.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://www.sevengroup.com" target="_blank">www.sevengroup.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Bldg-sim mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bldg-sim mailing list<br>
<a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Carol Gardner PE<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>