<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p>Chris,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>There many layers of differences between the two codes. However, there are some ways they can be compared, this is what Standard 140 from ASHRAE has been doing for the last 20 years (i.e., Ron Judkopf and Joel Neymark at NREL). Basically, there are envelope
tests, ground couping tests, systems tests, etc. Unfortunately, when all combined they can produce unpleasant differences that are hard to explain to clients. All differences, for the most part, have been cited in the previous literature, if you know where
to look.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We are currently developing a test of Equest, DOE-2.1e and EnergyPlus, as well as BIM files for three platforms as part of the RP1468 project we are working on. This may help to shed some light on a few issues...bottom line, the differences are complex,
but, in general, traceable to differences in specific algorithms in the three models. I might also add that one should consider several other programs when looking at differences, for example, ESPr, TRACE, HAP and TRNSYS...probably enough work to keep someone
busy for years tracing the differences.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Think of it like chosing a new car...all cars will deliver you from point A to point B, but different cars have different technologies to do that, diesel, gasoline, hybrid, and come in all shapes and sizes...cars, trucks, vans, etc.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
<p> </p>
<div>
<div><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Tahoma">8=! 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=( 8=) 8=() 8=) 8=| 8=) :=') 8=)8=?<br>
<br>
Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D.,P.E., FASHRAE..............jhaberl@tamu.edu<br>
<br>
Professor............................................................Office Ph: 979-845-6507<br>
<br>
Department of Architecture.............................Lab Ph:979-845-6065<br>
<br>
Energy Systems Laboratory.............................FAX: 979-862-2457<br>
<br>
Texas A&M University.....................................77843-3581<br>
<br>
College Station, Texas, USA, 77843..................URL:www.esl.tamu.edu<br>
<br>
8=/ 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=() 8=) :=) 8=) 8=! 8=) 8=? 8=)8=0<br>
</font></div>
</div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr" id="divRpF749112"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org [bldg-sim-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org] on behalf of David Eldridge [dse@grummanbutkus.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:14 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Chris Yates<br>
<b>Cc:</b> bldg-sim@lists.onebuilding.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bldg-sim] Energy consumption difference in E+ and Equest<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>If you haven't done this already, I would suggest comparing the other annual end-uses for the models as well.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If cooling is the only one varying then you have some questions about specific inputs. (equip efficiency, infiltration, etc.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>However, if all of the end-uses are varying between the two models then you'll have a wider group of inputs to consider. (internal gains, occupancy, envelope construction, etc., plus those above.)</div>
<div><br>
-DSE
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sent from my iPhone</div>
</div>
<div><br>
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:07 AM, Chris Yates <<a href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com" target="_blank">chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<div></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Vaibhav <br>
<br>
Sorry to nit pick... don't you mean kWh/sq.m/year?<br>
<br>
It's difficult to say what you're discrepancy comes from without having the models.<br>
All I can recommend is reviewing both model's results at successively deeper levels detail. You've already covered the first level of detail - the cooling consumption doesn't match.
<br>
Your next courses of action may be: <br>
<ol>
<li>Review monthly consumption<br>
</li><li>I haven't used equest but assume you can review <b>hourly </b>air temps and loads, so compare these next.
</li><li>Solar gain </li></ol>
Are your figures based on zone demand or plant? You've got quite a few layers to compare.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
Chris<br>
<br>
On 16/02/2011 06:49, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Hello,
<div><br>
We are trying to compare cooling energy consumption of a typical office building model in EnergyPlus and eQUEST. Simulation model is a simple 5 zone model with PTAC system. Climate is New Delhi. Heating consumption is near zero in both the models. We tried
our best to closely match models in these two software. The result says, cooling electricity consumption/sq.m./year is about- 35 KW/sq.m./year (in Energyplus) and 100 KW/sq.m./year (in Equest). Some of the guidelines says that cooling consumption should be
around 100-120KW/sq.m./year. Is this correct? Does any one has come across this phenomenon.<br>
<br>
Why EnergyPlus is giving very less consumption as compared to Equest or references?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks & regards,</div>
<div>Vaibhav Jain</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<pre><fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader" target="_blank"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div>
<p>Chris Yates <span style="COLOR: rgb(79,98,40)">C Eng MCIBSE</span></p>
<p><i>Building Physics Consultant</i></p>
<p>Tel:<span> </span>+447960731576</p>
<p>Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com" target="_blank">
</a><a href="mailto:chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com" target="_blank">chris.malcolm.yates@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Skype: <span class="SpellE">christopher.m.yates</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Bldg-sim mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org</a></span><br>
<span>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">
</a><a href="mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>