<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3199" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=442553616-24082009>Hello. I am using
the eQuest program and have a problem I'm hoping someone can help me
with.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=442553616-24082009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=442553616-24082009>I have reviewed all
of the input affecting 'Misc. Equip' energy usage (per the 'Description of
eQuest/DOE-2.2 End Use Reporting Categories') and have verfied all the inputs
for both my Baseline and Proposed buildings are identical, and that no
parametric run parameters modify those inputs, and yet my outputs remain
substantially different.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=442553616-24082009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=442553616-24082009>As the LEED
reviewers are insisting that my 'process' loads be identical for both the
baseline and proposed buildings, I need to either find a way to correct the
apparent mistake, or find a way to move the portion of the Misc. Equip output
that is changing to a non-process energy meter. (I have been unable to locate
where these particular inputs are assigned to one meter or
another).</SPAN></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Andrew
Clagett, PE, LEED® AP <BR>Mechanical<BR><B><SPAN style="COLOR: navy">HARGIS
ENGINEERS</SPAN></B> <BR>600 Stewart Street <BR>Suite 1000 <BR>Seattle, WA 98101
<BR><A style="COLOR: #808080; TEXT-DECORATION: none"
href="http://www.hargis.biz/">www.hargis.biz</A> <BR><BR><SPAN
style="COLOR: gray"><B>d | </B>206.436.0494</SPAN> <BR><SPAN
style="COLOR: gray"><B>o | </B>206.448.3376 </SPAN><BR><SPAN
style="COLOR: gray"><B> f | </B>206.448.4450</SPAN> <BR></FONT>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>