<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>RE: [bldg-sim] VAV control of underfloor air</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=950004721-04112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Apologies for confusion - the IRR quoted is simply for the decision to
utilise a VFD instead of not using a VFD. The economics of raised floor air
conditioning is an entirely different subject. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=950004721-04112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=950004721-04112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Cheers
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=950004721-04112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=950004721-04112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Rob
Lord</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Kirchhoff, Eric
[mailto:EKirchhoff@semprasolutions.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, 5 November
2002 1:48 AM<BR><B>To:</B> bldg-sim@gard.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [bldg-sim] VAV
control of underfloor air<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Although I have always been interested in designing such a
system I have yet to do so. However, that doesn't seem to stop me from
adding in some anecdotal information from friends who have designed such
systems. First off (not from friends, this is my own observation), a VFD
for an air handler tends to be nearly the same cost as a starter, except for
the additional control point-that being the differential pressure
sensor. Additionally, to keep costs down, I would let the VFD control
the situation, not the EMCS. Just have the VFD update the EMCS, and
allow the EMCS to reset the differential pressure sensor. Go ahead and
monitor all the points you want, and at least do start / stop, status, and DP
sensor reset. Like Robert says, the VFD is a cost wise investment, even
if you end up later on setting it up to be a constant speed system, the cost
risk is low.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Now I would like some additional information. The IRR of
30% to 50%; is that just for the mechanical investment or everything?
Since this type of system uses a raised floor system, all the utilities end up
running under the floor. Code will dictate the use of plenum rated cable
(even when run inside conduit), the floor system itself tends to be
proprietary-or at best limited in number of suppliers--hence supply and demand
comes into play driving the cost of the floor up and that is beyond the fact
that it is already more expensive since it needs to be structurally capable of
carrying the loads (including areas for very large filing systems), there are
a limited number of suppliers of underfloor vav systems (and the quality
varies), as a positive there is a greatly reduced amount of sheet metal used
for ductwork, there usually is not a realistic coordination between cubical /
office layout and diffuser placement (in large jobs, the eventual leasee is
unknown hence their layout needs are unknown) causing problems by a
maintenance staff that is unfamiliar with the system (despite training), and
another maintenance problem are users who do not understand nor properly
utilize the system hence they will block the diffusers (more often then the
overhead type). Plumbing may also be run in the floor space as well as
other utilities causing a need for additional wall furrings then may be in a
more traditional layout. Was there any account of these items in the IRR, or
was it a theoretical value based only on the mechanical components?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>I do not mean to discourage anyone from using this system, I
actually am very interested and excited to implement this type of system, and
believe (instinctually) that it is an energy efficient alternative to the
traditional diffusion method of airside systems. The points listed above
are things you should be aware of, and are questions to ask so as to minimize
their impact.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>As Rob says Good Luck, and have some fun!</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Eric Kirchhoff, PE</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From:
Robert Lord [<A
href="mailto:rgl.lsbris@lincolne.com.au">mailto:rgl.lsbris@lincolne.com.au</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 2:55 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>To: bldg-sim@gard.com</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Subject: [bldg-sim] VAV
control of underfloor air</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>A typical design is to zone the floor compartment according to
aspect and allow the individuals to adjust the swirls.</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>There are only a handful of large VAVs and the fan speed is varied
according to duct static pressure (not plenum pressure).</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>In most instances, I have found that the internal rate of
return is between 30% & 50% and hence is a good investment. I am sure VSD
pricing and energy pricing varies but a point to note is that the RH control
is improved.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Good luck!</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Rob Lord</FONT> </P><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From:
Molinini, Louis [<A
href="mailto:lmolinini@syska.com">mailto:lmolinini@syska.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2002 8:37 AM</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>To: bldg-sim@gard.com</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Subject: [bldg-sim] VAV
control of underfloor air</FONT> </P><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>Do any of you out there have any experience designing an
underfloor air</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>system with VAV control. The
particular system I am looking at is a plenum</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>based
system with manually adjustable swirl diffusers (Titus/Krantz). I
am</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>curious if it ends up operating like a constant
volume system or is it worth</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>the expense of installing
the freq drive and the Static pressure sensor or</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>differential pressure sensor. Any help is greatly
appreciated.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Thanks,</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>Louis</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>======================================================</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>You received this e-mail because you are subscribed</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>to the BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM mailing list. To
unsubscribe</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>from this mailing list send a blank
message to</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@GARD.COM</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>=====================================================You
received this e-mail because you are subscribed</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>to the
BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>from this mailing list send a blank message to</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@GARD.COM</FONT> </P></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>
===========================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@GARD.COM
</PRE></BODY></HTML>