<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Currently there is no "optimized static pressure
control" for fans/ducts in DOE-2. However, J. Hirsch & Associates
has funding to implement such a mechanism in DOE-2.2 within the next few
months. The funding is provided by Southern California Edison as part of
their "Energy Design Resources" program (<A
href="http://www.energydesignresources.com/">http://www.energydesignresources.com/</A>).
These enhancement will be incorporated into both DOE-2.2 and eQUEST (not
PowerDOE), and will be made available to the user community at no
charge.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This control mechanism will be similar to the head
reset controls already implemented for variable-flow pumping systems in
DOE-2.2, where the pump head setpoint can be reset based on the hourly head
demand of the worst-case valve. The actual pump head is then a function of the
worst-case valve head, plus the additional variable-flow head losses of the
loop piping and the central plant equipment. This control
sequence maximizes the potential savings of variable-speed pumps, as the
required speed of a pump is dependent on both the flow as well as the head
requirement; with the head requirement usually being the dominant factor.
(The maximum head of a pump varies roughly as the square of the impeller speed;
if the head requirement does not decrease as the flow drops off, then the speed
cannot decrease significantly).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For fans/ducts, the simple curve-fit that varies
fan power as a function of flow will become obsolete. Instead, DOE-2.2 will
keep track of the static requirement of the worst-case VAV box, as well as
ducting, coils, filters, etc. Each component must be accounted for
separately, as the head of all of these devices varies differently for a given
flow. (Some components, such as ducts and sound traps, experience
turbulent flow, and their head varies as the 1.85 power of flow. Other
components, such as coils and filters, are more laminar, and their head
typically varies in the range of the 1.1-1.6 power of flow. Still
others, such as a VAV box without an intelligent DDC system to monitor
damper position, will have a constant head requirement; i.e. a constant head
setpoint out toward the end of the ducting.) These changes will require
DOE-2.2 to know about the flow through each component in the system, the
component's head characteristic, as well as the fan map for a given type of fan
(forward-curved, airfoil, etc.) Based on flow and static requirement,
DOE-2.2 will then be able to determine the fan speed and power
consumption. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In the meantime, you can approximate "optimized
static pressure control" by generating a new curve that causes power to fall off
more rapidly with flow than the default curves. However, this is not a
straightforward task, as you would have to calculate by hand all of the
algorithms we have designed for DOE-2, and repeat the calculations for a series
of flows. Perhaps someone has already done this exercise, and can share
their curves with you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Steve Gates</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=babetsk@jbb.com href="mailto:babetsk@jbb.com">babetsk@jbb.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM
href="mailto:BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM">BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:41
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [BLDG-SIM] Static Pressure Reset
modeling in DOE 2</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV>To Doe 2 Users:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Hello,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Does anybody know if there is a way to model (in DOE-2) an
"optimized static pressure control", that is a control method where the
controller dynamically adjusts the static pressure set point based on the
position of the modulating devices in the VAV terminal units? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thank you</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Konstantin E. Babets, Ph.D.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>CFD/Energy Modeling Engineer</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jaros Baum and Bolles<BR>Consulting
Engineers<BR>80 Pine Street<BR>New York NY 1005<BR>Tel:
212.530.9455<BR>Fax: 212.269.5894<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV><PRE>
==================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@GARD.COM
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>
===========================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@GARD.COM
</PRE></BODY></HTML>