[Bldg-sim] Comcheck using ASHRAE 90.1-2010

[mughalhumera2 via Bldg-sim]

Dear All,
I wanted to have a suggestion. I did masters im Arhitectural Engineering from politecnico di milano. Now i got admsn with scholarship in palermo university, Italy as well as in University of Tokyo, Japan. Could you please help me out taking a decision. I am really nervous.


Sent from Samsung Mobile

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Keith Swartz via Bldg-sim <bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org> </div><div>Date:09/03/2017  11:39 PM  (GMT+01:00) </div><div>To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org </div><div>Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Comcheck using ASHRAE 90.1-2010 </div><div>
</div>Madhav,
 
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 has a 40% WWR limitation if following the prescriptive path. Otherwise you could follow Section 11. See 5.2.1.
 
Keith Swartz, PE | Senior Energy Engineer
Seventhwave
608.210.7123 seventhwave.org
 
From: Larry Degelman via Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 11:46 AM
To: Madhav Munshi <mmunshi at kohlerronan.com>; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Comcheck using ASHRAE 90.1-2010
 
Probably what’s at play here in ComCheck is that your envelope met the requirements of Section 5.6 (the building Envelope Trade-Off Option, by virtue of meeting the envelope performance factor in Appendix C).  Section 5.6 does not require that you comply to Section 5.5 (where the fenestration requirements are listed in Tables 5.5-xx.)
 
================================
Larry Degelman, P.E.
Professor Emeritus of Architecture
Texas A&M University
================================
 
From: Madhav Munshi via Bldg-sim
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 10:02 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Comcheck using ASHRAE 90.1-2010
 
Hi All,
 
I was checking a Comcheck compliance sheet for a project and the project was meeting compliance for ASHRAE 90.1-2010 using 60% WWR. I was really surprised by this and ran Comcheck myself (version 4.0.5.5) and found that I could get the envelope to pass with any amount of glazing as long as the total envelope UA was below the budget UA – regardless of glazing area.
 
I tried to see if I could do the same thing with IECC 2012 and it gave me an error but the program popped up a screen that told me to use ASHRAE 90.1-2010 because it does not have a max WWR limitation. See screenshots 1 & 2.
 
Is this really true? I was under the impression that we have to go with a performance route if the glazing exceeds 40% WWR? But that does not seem to be the case.
 
Appreciate the groups thoughts, thanks
 
Madhav
 
 

 
MADHAV MUNSHI | BEMP, LEED AP BD+C
 
Kohler Ronan, LLC | www.kohlerronan.com
mmunshi at kohlerronan.com
 
171 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
212.695.2422  F 212.695.2423
 
93 Lake Avenue, Danbury, CT 06810
203.778.1017  F 203.778.1018
 
 

            
 
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20170310/09a1fe4e/attachment-0001.html>