[Bldg-sim] VRF performance curve
Duggin, Cory
Cory.Duggin at tlc-eng.com
Wed May 27 06:13:29 PDT 2015
I would either use a WSHP or a chilled water system with 0 pumping energy.
Cory Duggin, PE, LEED AP BD+C
Associate/Energy Engineer
TLC Engineering for Architecture
direct:
615-346-1939
From: Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Rathna Shree
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:18 AM
To: BldgSim Mailing List; equest-users at onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] VRF performance curve
Dear All,
I worked on a couple of projects in equest using the VRF performance curves from Daikin and LG. The methodology i followed is as below:
1) Modelled packaged VAV with minimum flow ratio 1.
2) Created systems based on number of ODU's and assigned multiple zones to the respective ODU. (Just like modelling a AHU)
3) Inputted the ODU Cooling capacity and supply flow
4) Fans will be constant volume.
5) Since it is a cooling only system, i assigned only the "Cool EIR - fEWB-OAT", "Cool-EIR-fPLR" and "Cool cap-fEWB&OAT" curves. Rest were all default DX unit curves.
PVAV system is used as PSZ system cannot handle multiple zones well thus causing unmet hours.
I did 2 trials, one with default DX curves and the other with performance curves from LG and Daikin. The results showed a decrease in cooling energy consumption by more than 30% thus impacting the overall energy consumption by more than 10%.
Is the simulation methodology and results appropriate? I feel the savings is on a higher side.
Please advise.
Regards,
Rathnashree
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20150527/36ac8276/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list