[Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

Tue Mar 23 11:36:54 PDT 2010

I was at an Equest seminar the other day.  Equest does not have direct 
chilled beam modeling capability right now.  Those algorithms are due to be out in an update issued later this year(?).
Up till now, a work around has been used.  

________________________________
From: Jeremy Poling <jpoling at epsteinglobal.com>
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 2:30:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

I
know a couple of the eQuest/DOE2.2 guys watch this list – can you double check
this document and make sure it is up-to-date from your side?  One thing I saw
is that many people on the lists here report successfully modeling chilled beam
systems in eQuest and this document shows that to not be a capability.

JEREMY R. POLING, PE, LEED AP
Associate Vice President,
Senior Sustainability Analyst
Strategic Services
Site Solutions | Operations | Sustainability

EPSTEIN

Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you
please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

From:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Sturm, Eric
A.
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:34 AM
To: Travers, Mike; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

All,

The
original document (Simulation Tool Comparison.doc) had dated information
regarding TRACE 700.  We have updated the document to reflect current and
accurate information and added a few capabilities that have been
added to TRACE within the past several years.  With the additional
capabilities added, the document should be updated to reflect the current
capabilities of DOE 2.2, eQUEST, and HAP.

Regards,
Eric
Sturm
CDS
Marketing Engineer
Trane
Commercial Systems
Ingersoll
Rand
3600
Pammel Creek Rd
La
Crosse, WI 54601

Office: 
+1.608.787.3926
Fax: 
+1.608.787.3005
Email:  cdshelp at trane.com
Website:  www.tranecds.com

________________________________

From:Travers, Mike
[mailto:mtravers at RDKEngineers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:07 PM
To: Peterson, John (EYP/HP CFS); bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2
This is something that I took from another resource and have
been editing.  There are many moving targets relative to the release of
software updates etc., and may not be completely accurate, but the core
information is there
Hope this helps

Mike Travers, LEED AP | Senior Energy Engineer

RDK Engineers
Seaport Center, 70 Fargo Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02210
P: (857) 221-5933 | F: (857) 221-5934 | M:
(617) 938-0430
mtravers at rdkengineers.com
http://www.rdkengineers.com
Boston Globe Top Places to Work 2009
Boston Chamber of Commerce Business Excellence Award 2009

From:Peterson, John
(EYP/HP CFS) [mailto:jpeterson at hp.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:03 PM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

Has
there been any information released on the differences between energy
simulation programs?  We have a bid requirement with a certain percentage
listed and we have been asked to address the differences between the bid model
and the newly proposed model.  

Thanks
in advance –
John

John
Peterson, PE, LEED AP
HP
Critical Facilities Services delivered by EYP
6600
Rockledge Drive, 4th Floor
Bethesda,
MD  20817
cell:
202-731-5835 

This e-mail message and any attachments are
intended only for the designated recipient(s). In addition, this message and
its attachments, if any, may contain information that is proprietary,
confidential, or privileged and exempt from disclosure or otherwise protected
under applicable law. If you are not the designated recipient of this message,
you may not disclose, reproduce, distribute, or otherwise use this
transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient
is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this
message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail and
immediately delete this message from your system.

________________________________

The information contained in this message is privileged and
intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative
of the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message
or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message
and attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/480254b7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 145 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/480254b7/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5622 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/480254b7/attachment.jpeg>