[Equest-users] Modeling Typical IT Rooms AC Units
Nick Caton
ncaton at smithboucher.com
Tue Jun 28 08:20:25 PDT 2011
Hi Will!
We were almost burned hard specifying and approving Liebert for a LEED project under similar circumstances. Despite their large presence for a niche market, their efficiencies aren't entirely up to snuff with today's commercial energy codes.
We ultimately avoided having to send the equipment back (and foot the bill) in that case, but only because we were able to reason with both the local 90.1-compliance, LEED reviewers and other parties in play that this was a reality of the industry we had to live with. We did not attempt to "dodge" the code per the advice you were given below, but I do feel we were lucky. It takes no stretch of the imagination to picture an uncooperative AHJ/reviewer striking this down. The building altogether was an impressive performer, to be sure, but these isolated data room units left a sour taste. I will personally think hard about compliant alternatives before falling back to designing around Liebert for future LEED work.
That said, the approach given below is a new one to me. I also tend to model the proposed systems as they are, and apply a baseline system to the corresponding baseline zones. I haven't tried calling data room systems process loads before, but I suppose it could work if you're consistent in applying/documenting it that way. You might still find headaches trying to simultaneously document prescriptive compliance.
I'd be interested to hear others share any related experience =)!
~Nick
NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER
Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036
fax 913.345.0617
www.smithboucher.com
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Will Mak
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:47 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Modeling Typical IT Rooms AC Units
Hey all,
I'm working on a LEED energy model for an office building that has a couple standard sized data rooms for server storage. They will be served by a couple air cooled Liebert units. I started inputting information about the units in the proposed design model and requested EER information from our vendor. The EER value was provided but also pointed me towards ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Section 2.3 as the reason why EER values aren't typically provided for these types of units (he claims the cooling of the server rooms would be considered process cooling):
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Section 2.3 - The provisions of this standard do not apply to:
a. Single-family houses, multi-family structures of three stories or fewer above grade, manufactured houses (mobile homes), and manufactured houses (modular)
b. Buildings that do not use either electricity or fossil fuel, or
c. Equipment and portions of building systems that use energy primarily to provide for industrial, manufacturing, or commercial processes.
I've typically model the scheduled units on the proposed design model and System Type 3 or 4 on baseline model. However, if the above Section 2.3 applies, should we be modeling the systems that serve IT rooms in an office building as "process energy" and be equal?
William Mak, LEED AP BD+C
Mechanical Design Engineer
EPSTEIN
Architecture
Interiors
Engineering
Construction
Sustainability
600 West Fulton Street
Chicago, Illinois 60661-1259
D: (312) 429-8116
F: (312) 429-8800
E: wmak at epsteinglobal.com
W: www.epsteinglobal.com <http://www.epsteinglobal.com/>
þ Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110628/a90c9a97/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110628/a90c9a97/attachment.jpeg>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list