[Equest-users] Bldg Area in BEPS/BEPU
Ömer Moltay
omoltay at mimtarch.com
Tue Jun 21 04:56:02 PDT 2011
Dear Seth,
I realized the same problem due to a review comment from GBCI. I was
able to modify the net area values (actually only the MBTU/net area
value, as only this is displayed in the reports) by changing the
conditioned - unconditioned - plenum status of the spaces (be careful,
not the thermal zones, but the spaces). I do not know anything about the
MBTU/gross area value, since this is displayed as INF in my case
(meaning infinity? meaning I have infinite energy consumption ? :))
Hope this helps,
Omer Moltay
21.06.2011 14:49, Seth P. Spangler yazm?s,:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I recently completed a project and while going through the QC process
> I noticed that the building area as reported on the BEPS/BEPU reports
> does not match up with the model input. I have looked through the
> various other reports and the building square footage appears to be
> modeled as designed. I think the culprit might be unconditioned spaces
> but when I change these spaces to conditioned the problem still
> persists. Does anyone have any suggestions where to start trouble
> shooting or which report might tell me where the discrepancy is. The
> reported area is off by 15% on the BEU/BEPS reports.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> *Seth P Spangler, PE, LEED AP BD+C
> *
> ______________________________
>
> *RMF Engineering
> *Reliability. Efficiency. Integrity.
>
> p: 843.971.9639
> *www.rmf.com <http://www.rmf.com/>
> */"Find us on//Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/home.php#%21/pages/RMF-Engineering/193267750706493>"///
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110621/6ad3ef63/attachment.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list