[Equest-users] Modeling Office lighting occupancy
Allen Butler
abutler at cxgbs.com
Tue Mar 2 05:27:03 PST 2010
This is correct; a 10% LPD savings in each space with occupancy sensors
is the proper procedure. Regarding changes in occupancy scheduling to
model occupancy sensors, while this used to be acceptable for LEED I
have been called out on it by LEED reviewers and told I had to do the
10% LPD space reduction so I would avoid changing schedules to model
occupancy sensors.
Allen Butler, LEED AP
"Enhancing Delivery of Healthy, Sustainable, High Performance Buildings"
www.CxGBS.com
Phone 770 831 6760
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail transmission, and any documents,
files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain
confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or
attached to this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone at (770) 831 6760 and destroy the original transmission and
its attachments without reading them. Thank you.
CxGBS is not responsible for design concept, design criteria, compliance
with codes, design or general construction scheduling, cost estimating,
or construction management. We may assist with problem-solving or
resolving non-conformance or deficiencies, but ultimately that
responsibility resides with the general contractor and the design
professionals. The primary role of CxGBS is to review design documents
made available for review and endeavor to discover, on a limited basis,
potential design flaws, installation critical techniques represented in
the design, and coordination issues between documents provided.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vikram Sami [mailto:VSami at lasarchitect.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:54 PM
To: mabiz at cox.net; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Modeling Office lighting occupancy
I think according to appendix g,Table G 3.2, you can Take up to 10% for
it in spaces that have occ sensors (15% for buildings less than 5000
ft2). I think LEED will also accept differing schedules if they are
reasonable. You need to document this.
Vikram Sami, LEED AP
Direct Phone 404-253-1466 | Direct Fax 404-253-1366
LORD, AECK & SARGENT ARCHITECTURE
-----Original Message-----
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of
mabiz at cox.net
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:23 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Modeling Office lighting occupancy
I don't see any method for modeling occupancy sensors for overhead
ceiling lighting in an office environment. Does anyone know the proper
procedure? Do I change the ratios in the lighting schedule and if so
how much is acceptable for LEED projects?
Thanks,
Mark Beaudry P.E.
Air-Zona Systems Engineering, Inc.
Phoenix, AZ
_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list