[Equest-users] LEED Simulations
Nick Caton
ncaton at smithboucher.com
Tue Jul 6 11:08:23 PDT 2010
The rating authority for a LEED project is, essentially, USGBC - but
USGBC has more or less defined (if loosely) what is required for
documentation through the LEED EAc1 template/Handbook. You might do
better to keep section G1.4 in the back of your mind and instead refer
primarily to the current EAc1 template and associated Handbook chapter.
LEED EAc1 credits, using the first compliance (energy simulation)
method, are based on annual costs - not consumptions. I think that
syncs with 90.1's current glossary terms for performance...
~Nick
NICK CATON, E.I.T.
PROJECT ENGINEER
25501 west valley parkway
olathe ks 66061
direct 913 344.0036
fax 913 345.0617
Check out our new web-site @ www.smithboucher.com
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of tim
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:16 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] LEED Simulations
If attempting to show percent improvement for LEED credit per ASHRAE
90.1-2007 Appendix G, who is the "rating authority" in section G1.4?
USGBC? There will be similar documentation submitted to USGBC I know,
but is there some piece of information I am missing? Does ASHRAE "rate"
building performance based on eQuest results?
Also, second question, is percent improvement based on energy usage, or
cost of energy usage with regards to LEED?
Thanks!
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100706/63fa47af/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100706/63fa47af/attachment.jpeg>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list