[Equest-users] ASHRAE-90.1-2004 ruleset for eQuest

[Chris Wark]

John,

Are you sure that there is more money than "bodies"?

I would be MORE than happy to help them spend a chunk of their excess
funds (which I assume still come from us taxpayers) and fix some of the
obvious weaknesses in the software. 

Christopher Wark
Project Engineer
___________________________
RUMSEY 
E N G I N E E R S
Energy Efficient Design 
99 Linden Street
Oakland CA 94607
510 663 2070 x 239
fax 510 663 2080
cwark at rumseyengineers.com <mailto:eswalley at rumseyengineers.com>  
www.rumseyengineers.com <http://www.rumseyengineers.com/> 
___________________________

 

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of John
Aulbach
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:13 AM
To: Meng Li
Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] ASHRAE-90.1-2004 ruleset for eQuest

 


Meng:

 

My understanding is that each state has their own "add on" to 90.1 for
their Code Compliance. So I do see the eQuest sorcerors developing just
a Rule Set for LEED.

 

But maybe others have opinions..

 

Remember, we are talking about development resources (read: bodies) that
are strtched very thin. Money is plentiful (as i understand), manpower
is not.

 

John Aulbach

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090414/399da87f/attachment.htm>