[BLDG-SIM] blown-in cellulose vs batt insulation
John Ross
Energy.wwind at cox.net
Wed Jun 27 13:50:54 PDT 2007
Jeff Haberl wrote:
>FYI.
>
>There are also the PhD Theses by Sovik Bhattachara and Mingshing Liu from Texas A&M, both of these have one or more ASHRAE papers, and are based on laboratory results. Also, Joe Lstiburek has been studying this issue...and may have some reports as well. Bottom line, the "effective u-value" can vary significantly, and is influenced building pressureization/depressurization, mode (heat or cool), and exposure to incident solar radiation.
>
>Jeff
>BB 8=! 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=( 8=) :=') 8=) 8=) 8=? BB
>
>Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D., P.E.............................jhaberl at esl.tamu.edu
>
>Professor......................................................Office Ph: 979-845-6507
>
>Department of Architecture.......................Lab Ph: 979-845-6065
>
>Energy Systems Laboratory.......................FAX: 979-862-2457
>
>Texas A&M University..............................77843-3581
>
>College Station, Texas, USA.......................URL: www-esl.tamu.edu
>
>BB 8=/ 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=() 8=) 8=? 8=) 8=) 8= BB
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: BLDG-SIM at gard.com <BLDG-SIM at gard.com>
>To: BLDG-SIM at gard.com <BLDG-SIM at gard.com>
>Sent: Wed Jun 20 10:28:59 2007
>Subject: [BLDG-SIM] blown-in cellulose vs batt insulation
>
>Hi all,
>
>Does anyone know of published measured data comparing infiltration rates with batt versus wet blown-in cellulose insulation in a stud cavity? I have one study by David Yuill that was very informative, but I'd like to find some additional sources.
>
>Thanks,
>Aleka
>
>
>
Please give us the complete citation for David Yuill thanks......
jrr
======================================================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM at GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at GARD.COM
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list